This paper offers an alternate paradigm to an essentialist paradigm of understanding academic disciplines, the deflationary perspective on academia, to acknowledge and evaluate the significance of caring practices.
Author
Sahana V Rajan, Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India.
Summary
The identity of an academic discipline is essentially tied to production and reproduction of its disciplinary knowledge. This, in turn, determines the criteria of academic achievement for academicians belonging to a particular discipline. The ability of an academician to contribute to the disciplinary knowledge through publication of high-impact papers is considered to be of highest value in academic disciplines.
This constitutes an essentialist paradigm of understanding academic disciplines. Such a paradigm, however, undervalues other equally important forms of academic labour, like academic service, which support, develop and repair the academic world through practice of care.
In his paper, the essentialist paradigm is critically appraised through Paperwinner’s Model, an adaptation of Breadwinner’s Model. Through the lens of ethics of care, specifically Joan Tronto’s responsibility-based ethics, the paper offers an alternate paradigm, the deflationary perspective on academia, to acknowledge and evaluate the significance of caring practices. The paper concludes with a formative suggestion to institutionally recognize and reward care through service-intensive positions.
Published in: Journal of Academic Ethics
To read the full article, please click here.
