While strength of human capital can promote blockchain technology, a lack of institutional strength negatively influences the relationship, says the study.
Authors
Deepika Chandra Verma, Fellow, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta; Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Shashi Kant Srivastava, Indian Institute of Management Sirmaur, Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Srinivas Jangirala, Associate Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Janardan Krishna Yadav, Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Summary
From institutional economics perspective this study identifies blockchain as an example of new financial institution. Further, the study explores existing institutional strength such as economic, human capital, and political on the adoption/development of the blockchain technology in a cross-country analysis. To do so, it employs the concepts of institutional economics.
The path analysis of the relationships of the various global indicators reveals that only the human capital of a country significantly affects the development of blockchain technology, while economic and political capitals does not play any role in it. Further, the general institutional strength parameter of a country fully mediates the relationship of human capital and blockchain development.
While we found convincing evidence that strength of human capital can promote blockchain technology, the examination also reveals that a lack of institutional strength negatively influences the relationship.
Published in: Academy of Management Journal
To read the full article, please click here.
