Law & Legal Studies

Questioning Human Rights, Looking for Justice: Analyzing the Impact of Supreme Court Circular Letter on Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia

Questioning Human Rights, Looking for Justice: Analyzing the Impact of Supreme Court Circular Letter on Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia

This article analyzes the Indonesian Supreme Court’s circular letter, which influences how interfaith marriages are recognized and regulated. The authors explore tensions between religious norms, human rights principles, and the quest for justice, shedding light on the challenges faced by interfaith couples in seeking legal and social recognition.

Authors

Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti, Faculty of Law, Universitas Merdeka, Malang, Indonesia.

Anak Agung Ayu Nanda Saraswati, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.

Eka Nugraha Putra, Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India.

Summary

The issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages between People of Different Religious Beliefs has caused problems regarding interfaith marriages in Indonesia. Both conceptually and in practice, interfaith marriages have long been controversial.

Using a human rights approach, this article analyzes SEMA’s position in the hierarchy of laws and regulations and the impact of SEMA Number 2 of 2023 on the independence of judges and the practice of interfaith marriages in Indonesia. The results of the analysis indicate that SEMA Number 2 of 2023 is contrary to human rights principles, especially the principles of religious rights, the right to choose a partner and the right to get married.

Although the content of SEMA should only be related to technical matters of court processes, SEMA Number 2 of2023 targets the substance of citizens’ rights; it asks judges to reject requests for the validation of interfaith marriages, even though the issue is clearly- regulated by the Law on Population Administration. As a result, the chances of validating interfaith marriages through court decisions are closed. This policy not only limits the independence of judges in deciding such cases but also violates the human rights of citizens.

Published in: Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies

To read the full article, please click here.