Problematising the historiographic assertion of medical modernisation in colonial India to be a part of ‘civilising mission’, this paper argues that legislature emerged as a platform of activism and protest against the colonial and post-colonial State’s appropriation of modernity.
Author
Kaushalya Bajpayee, Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Summary
Colonial medical education and public health policies emerged from an intriguing discourse of negotiation between the government and the people. These ‘structured conflicts’, rooted in the politics and the debates of the colonial institutions not only provided opportunities for creative thinking about public health but also for imposing constraints.
The colonial and post-colonial India medical legislative debates revealing a new language of protest, assumed greater significance with the growing nationalist movement and the general (though variegated) intellectual polarisation – western and indigenous systems of medicine.
Problematising the historiographic assertion of medical modernisation in colonial India to be a part of ‘civilising mission’, this paper argues that legislature emerged as a platform of activism and protest against the colonial and post-colonial State’s appropriation of modernity.
While some members appealed for extending the benefit of ‘modern’ western medicine to the general Indian population, some debated in favour of introducing the indigenous medical systems to the terms of modern professionalisation.
The post-colonial policies reveal the true significance of the legislative debates in reviving the position of indigenous systems of medicine in the context of professional modernity.
Published in: Global Public Health
To read the full article, please click here.
