Business & Management Studies

Emerging regulatory gaps in fracking-specific water security issues in India: Lessons from the United States ‘Shale Revolution’

Emerging regulatory gaps in fracking-specific water security issues in India: Lessons from the United States ‘Shale Revolution’

This article identifies four key paradigms of water security and maps these key paradigms with the US fracking experience, identifying four key fracking-specific water issues.

Authors

Shashi Kant Yadav, PhD Candidate at the University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Chhaya Bhardwaj, Associate Professor, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India; PhD Candidate at Dublin City University, Ireland.

Gopal K Sarangi, Associate Professor, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi, India.

Summary

India has characterised shale gas as a transitional energy source and is planning to commercially scale the extraction of shale gas through hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Currently, India has announced 56 fracking projects spread across six Indian states. In doing so, exploration of shale gas resources has started in India. The regulations that govern conventional extraction processes are also applicable to fracking activities.

The conflation of fracking with conventional drilling processes in India’s regulatory approach may have implications for the country’s water security, given the unique risks that fracking poses to water resources. This article analyses India’s regulatory framework applicable to fracking-specific water (FSW) issues.

In doing so, this article identifies four key paradigms of water security and maps these key paradigms with the US fracking experience, identifying four key FSW issues. Subsequently, this article evaluates if India’s multilevel regulatory system regulates the identified four FSW issues.

In conclusion, this research finds that before commercially scaling fracking operations, India must conduct a scientific inquiry on the impact of proposed fracking projects on its water resources. In doing so, it must re-examine its regulations at the federal and state levels to comprehensively cover FSW issues.

Published in: Environmental Law Review

To read the full article, please click here.